Concepts
When working on a project with multiple developers, it is crucial to have a well-defined pull request workflow in place. This helps ensure that code changes are reviewed, tested, and deployed efficiently and with minimum risk. In Microsoft DevOps Solutions, you can leverage branch policies and branch protections to design and implement an effective pull request workflow. Let’s explore these concepts and understand how to use them effectively.
Branch Policies:
Branch policies allow you to define specific conditions and checks that must be satisfied before a pull request can be completed. These policies help enforce quality control and prevent code issues from being merged into the main branch. Here are some essential branch policies you can implement:
- Require at least one approving review: By enabling this policy, you ensure that a pull request cannot be completed unless it has received a specific number of approving reviews from designated reviewers. This ensures that code changes are thoroughly inspected before being merged.
- Check for linked work items: This policy ensures that all pull requests are associated with work items, providing traceability and accountability. It helps maintain a clear record of the changes made and the reasons behind them.
- Build validation: Enabling this policy ensures that the code changes in a pull request successfully pass the build process. The build validation policy helps catch any compilation errors, ensuring that only working code is merged.
Pull Request Content
Pull Request
This pull request is related to the user story #1234.
Branch Protections:
Branch protections provide an additional layer of security by enforcing rules on branch manipulation, preventing accidental modifications or unauthorized changes. Here are a few branch protections you can implement:
- Require a minimum number of reviewers: You can configure branches to require a specific number of reviewers for all changes. This ensures that multiple sets of eyes review the code, facilitating collaboration and reducing the risk of introducing defects.
- Restrict who can push to the branch: By limiting who can push changes directly to protected branches, you ensure that only authorized individuals or teams can modify the code. This prevents accidental or unauthorized changes, maintaining code integrity.
- Enforce merge checks: Merge checks allow you to specify criteria that must be met before merging a pull request. These checks can include policies such as build validation, work item linking, and specific branch permissions. Enforcing merge checks ensures that only approved, validated, and compliant code changes are merged.
Code Review Workflow with Branch Policies and Protections:
Now, let’s outline a typical pull request workflow using branch policies and protections:
- Create a feature branch: Each developer creates a new branch from the main branch (or any designated development branch) to work on their respective feature or bug fix.
- Implement changes and create a pull request: The developer makes the necessary code changes, commits them to their feature branch, and creates a pull request to merge their changes into the main branch.
- Assign reviewers and await feedback: The pull request is assigned to one or more reviewers who thoroughly inspect the code, provide feedback, and request necessary changes. Branch policies ensure that the pull request cannot be completed without the required number of approving reviews.
- Address feedback and iterate: The developer addresses the feedback and updates their code accordingly. They push the changes to their branch, which automatically triggers the build validation policy. If the build passes, the reviewer re-evaluates the changes.
- Complete the pull request: Once the required approvals are obtained, the pull request can be completed, merging the changes into the main branch. Merge checks ensure that all necessary policies, such as work item linking and build validation, have been satisfied.
By following this workflow and leveraging branch policies and protections, you establish a robust and controlled environment for collaborating on code changes. This process promotes quality, collaboration, and traceability, reducing the likelihood of introducing errors and enabling more efficient software delivery.
Remember, while the example snippets provided above are in HTML, the concepts of branch policies and branch protections can be implemented in various development environments and version control systems, including Microsoft Azure DevOps Services and Azure DevOps Server.
Implementing a well-defined pull request workflow is crucial for any development team. By utilizing the capabilities of branch policies and branch protections in Microsoft DevOps Solutions, you can ensure code quality, improve collaboration, and safeguard your codebase from potential errors or unauthorized changes.
Answer the Questions in Comment Section
True or False: Branch policies and branch protections can help enforce code quality and prevent accidental merging of incomplete or untested code.
Answer: True
Which of the following can be enforced using branch policies? (Select all that apply)
- a) Code review by specific individuals
- b) Successful completion of continuous integration (CI) builds
- c) Limiting the number of approvals required for merging
- d) Blocking specific file types from being committed
Answer: a), b), c)
True or False: Branch policies can be set at both the repository level and branch level.
Answer: True
Which of the following actions can be restricted using branch protections? (Select all that apply)
- a) Force pushing to the protected branch
- b) Deleting the protected branch
- c) Merging pull requests without required approvals
- d) Changing the branch policy settings
Answer: a), b), c)
True or False: Branch policies can be customized for different branches within a repository.
Answer: True
Which event triggers a build validation in a branch policy?
- a) Opening a pull request
- b) Approving a pull request
- c) Committing changes to a branch
- d) Closing a pull request
Answer: a)
How can branch policies be configured to require a minimum number of successful builds before allowing a pull request to be merged?
- a) By setting a specific threshold for the required successful builds
- b) By selecting a specific build definition for validation
- c) By specifying the required build status checks
- d) By configuring the build validation trigger settings
Answer: c)
True or False: When setting up branch protections, administrators have the option to allow specific individuals or teams to override the restrictions.
Answer: True
Which of the following options can be configured in a branch policy for code review? (Select all that apply)
- a) Required number of reviewers
- b) Specific individuals or teams who must approve the code
- c) Blocking specific user roles from approving the code
- d) Automatic code analysis and suggestions
Answer: a), b), d)
True or False: Branch protections can be bypassed by administrators even if they don’t have merge permissions.
Answer: False
Great blog post! The information on branch policies is exactly what I needed for my upcoming exam.
Can anyone explain more about the difference between branch policies and branch protections?
How do you handle code reviews in a large team using branch policies?
I appreciate this detailed explanation. Well-done!
The examples given in this blog post are very useful for understanding practical implementation.
One critical aspect I found missing was how to manage merge conflicts during pull requests with branch policies.
Thanks for the information. It’s quite insightful!
Not very useful. Could have added more examples.