Concepts
In executing any program, one of the most critical aspects to ensure success is monitoring and control. These two critical activities ensure the program stays on track, resources are optimally utilized, and the desired outcomes are achieved. As a Program Management Professional (PgMP), understanding how to evaluate the program’s status is key to effective monitoring and control.
Understanding Monitoring and Control
Firstly, understanding the importance of monitoring and control in program management is critical. Monitoring refers to the systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and using information to track a program’s progress toward achieving its objectives. On the other hand, controlling focuses on analyzing the metrics from the monitoring process and deciding and implementing the necessary changes.
Steps in Monitoring and Controlling Programs
Monitoring and controlling programs involve a few key steps.
- Setting Benchmarks: The first step in program monitoring and control is to establish benchmarks or performance standards. These benchmarks are what the actual program performance will be compared against.
- Performance Measurement: The next step involves tracking the performance of the program against these benchmarks. Various tools can be used such as Earned Value Management (EVM), a technique for measuring project performance and progress. Other tools include Gantt Charts, PERT charts, and Critical Path Analysis.
- Variance Analysis: This step involves analyzing differences between the planned and actual performance. Variances could be due to factors such as changes in scope, costs, or resource allocation.
- Forecasting: Based on the monitoring and variance analysis, predictions are made about the future performance of the program.
- Change Management: Finally, actions are taken to get back on track if a program is not performing as expected. These actions could be changes in scope, cost, timelines, or resource allocation.
Applying Monitoring and Control Steps
Understanding how to use these steps with current program information is vital for effective monitoring and control.
Example
Let’s look at an example. Assume you are overseeing the development of a software product as a PgMP. The benchmarks set at the beginning, including the budget, timeline, and Project Management Triangle (Scope, Cost, Time), are all important. Now, if monitoring reports show variances, for instance, if the coding phase is consuming more time than planned, you need to identify the cause. The reason could be unexpected bugs or perhaps, inadequate resources. Depending on the cause, prompt control measures can be undertaken, like bringing in more experienced coders or ramping up the team size.
The Importance of Constant Evaluation
In this way, constant evaluation of a program’s status and the application of structured monitoring and control processes help a PgMP steer the program towards its goals efficiently and effectively. The continuous nature of monitoring ensures early detection of variances from the plan, while effective control ensures that corrective actions are taken promptly to keep the program on course.
Summary
To summarize, proper evaluation of a program’s status, followed by effective monitoring and control, are essential in program management. Adequate knowledge of these controls, measurement tools, and analyses is crucial for a Program Management Professional (PgMP). Such routines, when diligently and competently applied, can increase the chances of a program’s success even amidst changing project landscapes and unforeseen hurdles.
Answer the Questions in Comment Section
The management of a program includes the monitoring and controlling of individual projects.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: a. True
Explanation: Program management encompasses managing several related projects simultaneously, which includes the monitoring and control of those individual projects.
Program status evaluation can be performed at any time, without any specific trigger or reason.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: a. True
Explanation: While regularly scheduled reviews are critical, program status evaluations can also be done as required or triggered by specific milestones, risks, or issues.
Program Information Management Systems (PIMS) do not play a significant role in evaluating a program’s status.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: b. False
Explanation: PIMS assist in maintaining current program information and provide tools necessary for evaluating programs’ status, direction, and speed.
It is unnecessary to review program’s status if all the individual projects are meeting their objectives.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: b. False
Explanation: A program may still fail to meet its overall objectives even if all individual projects are successful. Therefore, it’s important to evaluate the program’s status regularly.
Frequent program status evaluation can help in risk management.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: a. True
Explanation: Regular monitoring and evaluation can help identify potential risks in advance and manage them appropriately.
Which of the following are not ways of gathering data to monitor and control the program?
- a. Surveys
- b. Interviews
- c. Workshops
- d. Meditation
Answer: d. Meditation
Explanation: Data for monitoring and controlling the program can be collected by various methods such as surveys, interviews, and workshops. Meditation, although beneficial for personal well-being, does not contribute to data gathering in a program management context.
Stakeholder communication is only important during the planning phase of the program.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: b. False
Explanation: Communication with stakeholders is a continuous process. It is critical for maintaining program information and understanding the program’s status at all stages.
Current program information can be maintained without the documentation process.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: b. False
Explanation: Documentation is crucial for maintaining current program information. It helps to track changes, decisions, and updates throughout the program lifecycle.
Regular status evaluations are necessary to ensure that the program is progressing in line with the objectives.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: a. True
Explanation: Regular status evaluations help to identify any deviations from the planned objectives and implement corrective actions.
Using a central repository for all program information can confuse the process of program status evaluation.
- a. True
- b. False
Answer: b. False
Explanation: A central repository aids in monitoring and controlling the program by providing easy access to all relevant information. It can facilitate the process of program status evaluation, not confuse it.
Great post! Monitoring and controlling programs is crucial for timely completion.
Can someone explain the best practice for maintaining current program information?
Agree, frequent status meetings are vital for staying on top of issues.
Awesome content, very helpful for my PgMP preparation.
What kind of tools do you use to monitor your program’s status?
A sound change control process is critical for maintaining current program information.
Indeed, without a robust change control process, the program can easily become chaotic.
Love this blog, thanks for sharing!