If this material is helpful, please leave a comment and support us to continue.
Table of Contents
The implementation of a test-driven feedback loop is pivotal in the smooth operation of an Advanced Certified Scrum Developer (A-CSD) project. The feedback loop ensures a constant and consistent exchange of information, ideas, and opinions between developers (the Scrum team) and the stakeholders/users to develop a relevant, functional, and efficient product. This discourse is done using either a formal or informal approach.
An example of a formal approach is through defect reporting. During the testing phase, the Scrum team identifies issues/bugs with the product. Stakeholders and users are informed of these defects in a formal report, which they review and give their feedback accordingly. The Scrum team then fixes these defects based on the stakeholders/users’ feedback.
Feedback Phase | Description |
---|---|
1. Identification | The Scrum team spots defects/issues during the testing phase. |
2. Reporting | The team compiles a defect report detailing the identified issues. |
3. Review | Stakeholders/users assess the report and give their feedback. |
4. Remediation | The team fixes the defects based on the feedback received. |
Another example of the formal approach is through User Acceptance Tests (UATs). Here, the Scrum team develops a product or feature and hands it over to the stakeholders/users for testing. The users then provide their feedback, which is implemented into the product to enhance its performance and usability.
Direct communication is an example of an informal method. There are no formal reports or documents involved. The Scrum team directly interacts with the users/stakeholders, discussing the progress of the project and receiving feedback. Direct communication can take place through meetings, emails, calls, video conferences, or online chat platforms. This method is effective for quick responses and adjustments.
Prototyping is another informal approach that can be used by the Scrum team. In this method, the team creates a working model of the product or feature and presents it to the stakeholders/users. The users/stakeholders then interact with the prototype and provide their feedback, which is then implemented into the final product.
The chosen approach to implement a test-driven feedback loop depends on the project’s nature and the stakeholders/users involved. Regardless of the method chosen, the primary focus should be on ensuring a clear, consistent, and productive dialogue between the Scrum team and the stakeholders/users. It is this communication that will facilitate the production of a successful product that meets the users’ needs. Moreover, this feedback loop plays an integral part in the Advanced Certified Scrum Developer (A-CSD) process; therefore, it should be effectively implemented and managed.
Answer: False.
Explanation: Stakeholders play a crucial role in the test driven feedback loop, particularly in verifying the functionality of developed features and providing key feedback.
Answer: C. Implementing behavioral driven development (BDD)
Explanation: BDD is an approach that allows for communication with stakeholders and users, making it a vital part of the test driven feedback loop.
Answer: True.
Explanation: Timely feedback helps in identifying any flaws or errors in the code early on, allowing for prompt debugging.
Answer: C. To facilitate early identification and resolution of errors
Explanation: While all the options may be beneficial effects, the primary goal of a test driven feedback loop is early identification and resolution of errors.
Answer: False.
Explanation: A test driven feedback loop supports continuous integration by allowing for early error detection and resolution, thus leading to a smoother and continuous development process.
Answer: True.
Explanation: Through UAT, stakeholders and users can verify the functionality of development features, thus becoming a part of the test driven feedback loop.
Answer: A. True
Explanation: Prototyping allows stakeholders and users to interact with an early version of the product, thus enabling the collection of valuable feedback for the test-driven feedback loop.
Answer: A. Increased cost
Explanation: While implementing a test-driven feedback loop might have an upfront cost, in the long run, it leads to reduced risk, higher product quality, and improved user experience.
Answer: A. True
Explanation: It is crucial for the whole team to be involved for effective feedback and communication.
Answer: B. False
Explanation: Test automation tools streamline the testing process making it faster and more effective, hence they play a relevant role in a test-driven feedback loop.
40 Replies to “apply at least one approach to implement a test driven feedback loop with stakeholders and users.”
Thanks for the valuable insights!
Informative blog, helped me a lot in understanding the importance of feedback loops.
Thank you for sharing. Very helpful.
Absolutely, TDD is crucial for maintaining high-quality code. Has anyone tried Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) to involve stakeholders?
Yes, BDD is really effective. It helps in bridging the communication gap between technical and non-technical stakeholders.
I second that. BDD scenarios written in Gherkin make it easier for stakeholders to understand the requirements.
Currently, we implement TDD with regular stakeholder meetings. It’s very effective.
Regular meetings are key. It keeps everyone on the same page.
I think the post needs more diagrams to illustrate the feedback loop.
Appreciate the detailed explanation.
We had success using real-time analytics for immediate user feedback. Anyone else tried this?
Using tools like Google Analytics or Mixpanel can provide real-time insights.
Real-time analytics are fantastic for pinpointing user experience issues as they happen.
Good read!
Involving non-technical team members in the feedback loop can be challenging. Any suggestions?
Workshops and regular demo sessions can also help engage non-technical stakeholders.
Utilize visual tools like user story maps or kanban boards. They make it easier for non-tech members to understand progress.
Appreciate the article, Thank you!
I’ve tried using end-user feedback loops but found it somewhat delay-prone. Any tips?
Consider A/B testing for faster user feedback.
Using lightweight prototypes can help gather quicker feedback from end-users.
Thanks for the informative post!
Interesting read, but I think it needs more real-world examples.
How often should we gather feedback from stakeholders?
Weekly or bi-weekly sprints work best for us. It depends on the project size and complexity.
Thanks for this post. It clarified many doubts!
Great post! Implementing a test-driven feedback loop with stakeholders ensures continuous improvement and alignment in project goals.
For CI/CD, what tools do you recommend for implementing a feedback loop?
Don’t forget Azure Pipelines if you’re working within a Microsoft ecosystem. It’s robust and integrates well.
Jenkins and GitLab CI are fantastic tools. They support various integrations and provide immediate feedback.
Can someone share experience with using user stories for this? How do they fit into the feedback loop?
We use user stories extensively. After implementation, we collect stakeholder feedback and iterate over them.
User stories are great for capturing stakeholder requirements, which can then be validated through tests as part of the TDD approach.
Using test doubles (mocks, stubs, etc.) can also be beneficial in a TDD workflow. Anyone experienced with that?
Indeed, test doubles can isolate the unit under test and provide instantaneous feedback!
Test doubles are a must. Beware of overusing mocks though, as it can make tests brittle.
What about using Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines as part of the feedback loop?
CI/CD pipelines are excellent for providing instant feedback but need proper setup to avoid false positives in tests.
Don’t forget to include performance tests and security scans in your pipeline.
Agreed. Automated tests in the CI/CD pipelines can drastically reduce the feedback cycle.